S. Smith Griswold to Edmund s. Muskie Regarding S. 306

Document Viewer

On the first day of the subcommittee hearings, the Assistant Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW), James M. Quigley, made comments that seemed to place the administration at odds with Muskie and S. 306. Quigley declared that the proposed controls were premature, that current federal authority was adequate, and that “we do not recommend enactment of regulatory legislation at this time….” This letter from S. Smith Griswold, California Air Pollution Control Officer, expressed his alarm over Quigley’s remarks and urged Muskie to push ahead with strong regulation. Quigley returned to the subcommittee hearings to clarify that he was only objecting to S. 306’s detailed standards and aggressive timeline to implement emission controls.

Files

cfla_0009.jpg
cfla_0010.pdf

Citation

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Public Works. "S. Smith Griswold to Edmund s. Muskie Regarding S. 306." S. Smith Griswold to Edmund s. Muskie Regarding S. 306, April 16, 1965; “S. 306, Miscl. Corresp. Re air pollution” folder, Legislative Files, Box 3; Committee on Public Works; 89th Congress; Records of the U.S. Senate, RG 46; National Archives.. Accessed 28 March 2024. https://acsc.lib.udel.edu/items/show/325.

Dublin Core

Title

S. Smith Griswold to Edmund s. Muskie Regarding S. 306

Subject

Motor Vehicle Air Pollution Control and Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1965

Description

On the first day of the subcommittee hearings, the Assistant Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare (HEW), James M. Quigley, made comments that seemed to place the administration at odds with Muskie and S. 306. Quigley declared that the proposed controls were premature, that current federal authority was adequate, and that “we do not recommend enactment of regulatory legislation at this time….” This letter from S. Smith Griswold, California Air Pollution Control Officer, expressed his alarm over Quigley’s remarks and urged Muskie to push ahead with strong regulation. Quigley returned to the subcommittee hearings to clarify that he was only objecting to S. 306’s detailed standards and aggressive timeline to implement emission controls.

Creator

United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Public Works

Source

S. Smith Griswold to Edmund s. Muskie Regarding S. 306, April 16, 1965; “S. 306, Miscl. Corresp. Re air pollution” folder, Legislative Files, Box 3; Committee on Public Works; 89th Congress; Records of the U.S. Senate, RG 46; National Archives.

Publisher

Association of Centers for the Study of Congress

Date

*1965-04-16

Contributor

Center for Legislative Archives, National Archives and Records Administration

Rights

Materials on this site are provided for educational use under Fair Use outlined by U.S. Copyright law. This item may be protected under copyright. It is the responsibility of the user to obtain permission from the copyright holder before publishing or reproducing materials. For assistance, please contact the contributor of this material.

Format

JPEG/PDF

Language

English

Type

Document

Identifier

cfla_0009.jpg; cfla_0010.pdf